# Debug feature directly to links

**URL:** https://discourse.nodered.org/t/debug-feature-directly-to-links/100055
**Category:** Feature Requests
**Created:** [31 December 2025 11:09 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/debug-feature-directly-to-links/100055 "2025-12-31T11:09:17Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jbudd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/5f8ce5/32.png) [@jbudd](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/jbudd)
#### Post date: [31 December 2025 15:28 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/debug-feature-directly-to-links/100055/4 "2025-12-31T15:28:56Z")

</div>

I think @burner is referring to wires?

There was a long discussion on debug changes at [https://discourse.nodered.org/t/should-debug-nodes-be-capable-of-passing-the-message-forwards/](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/should-debug-nodes-be-capable-of-passing-the-message-forwards/)

I think the general feeling was that wires should not acquire debugging abilities, nor should debug nodes pass the message onwards.

Among alternative suggestions were:

- The message handling code should allow debug output at any node's input or output connector.
- Junction nodes should be given a debug role. This one seems the simplest to implement.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/debug-feature-directly-to-links/100055)._
