# Deploy with improperly configured nodes

**URL:** https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464
**Category:** Feature Requests
**Tags:** editor
**Created:** [17 February 2025 12:06 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464 "2025-02-17T12:06:14Z")
**Posts on this page:** 10
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jbudd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/5f8ce5/32.png) [@jbudd](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/jbudd)
#### Post date: [17 February 2025 12:06 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464/1 "2025-02-17T12:06:14Z")

</div>

When you do a deploy, even only of modified nodes, Node-red checks all flows for nodes not properly configured. Of course this is essential, a badly configured node might be accessed by a link from the current flow, or it may be a config node not visible on any flow.

Is it possible to ignore improperly configured nodes which are on a disabled tab?

For example, I have a tab with dashboard v1 nodes.  
The tab is disabled and it's dashboard page(tab) is deleted but I want to retain the nodes for reference.

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/uploads/nodered/original/3X/3/9/39748e028a3d1cec648ca37d69782cd5883d82cd.png)

Now I'm working on an unrelated flow and a deploy brings up irrelevant warnings

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/uploads/nodered/original/3X/c/c/cc9e33b568e4548a9aa64653ab1f97e92d3f5ce4.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![GogoVega](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/user_avatar/discourse.nodered.org/gogovega/32/71313_2.png) [@GogoVega](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/GogoVega)
#### Post date: [17 February 2025 12:31 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464/2 "2025-02-17T12:31:47Z")

</div>

In fact the deployment should ignore them, I'll investigate.

Ok, only works if the node is disabled - will fix that 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![omrid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/77aa72/32.png) [@omrid](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/omrid)
#### Post date: [17 February 2025 12:45 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464/3 "2025-02-17T12:45:35Z")

</div>

I fully fully concur with this, and would also add another related request:  
Today, when I deploy, if there are unused configuration nodes I get a warning. While I can see the value in warning against accumulating garbage, sometimes I may want to have a set of configuration nodes (e.g. DB connections) of which only one is concurrently active, and would not want to get warned of unused config nodes who are disabled

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Steve-Mcl](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/user_avatar/discourse.nodered.org/steve-mcl/32/4826_2.png) [@Steve-Mcl](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/Steve-Mcl)
#### Post date: [17 February 2025 13:00 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464/4 "2025-02-17T13:00:50Z")

</div>

> [@omrid](#):
>
> I may want to have a set of configuration nodes (e.g. DB connections) of which only one is concurrently active, and would not want to get warned of unused config nodes who are disabled

100% if a node or config is badly configured AND is disabled, I don't want to be bugged every time. I disabled it for a reason.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![GogoVega](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/user_avatar/discourse.nodered.org/gogovega/32/71313_2.png) [@GogoVega](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/GogoVega)
#### Post date: [17 February 2025 13:02 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464/5 "2025-02-17T13:02:20Z")

</div>

Agreed.

> <https://github.com/node-red/node-red/pull/5054>
>
> \## Types of changes
> 
> \- \[x\] Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
> …- \[\] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
> 
> \## Proposed changes
> 
> Ref: https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464.
> 
> Ignore invalid nodes and unused config nodes if they are disabled or the parent flow is disabled.
> 
> \## Checklist
> 
> \- \[x\] I have read the \[contribution guidelines\](https://github.com/node-red/node-red/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
> \- \[\] For non-bugfix PRs, I have discussed this change on the forum/slack team.
> \- \[x\] I have run \`npm run test\` to verify the unit tests pass
> \- \[\] I have added suitable unit tests to cover the new/changed functionality

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jbudd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/5f8ce5/32.png) [@jbudd](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/jbudd)
#### Post date: [17 February 2025 13:18 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464/6 "2025-02-17T13:18:24Z")

</div>

Thanks @GogoVega 👍

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Colin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/user_avatar/discourse.nodered.org/colin/32/17040_2.png) [@Colin](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/Colin)
#### Post date: [17 February 2025 15:09 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464/7 "2025-02-17T15:09:12Z")

</div>

Can one disable a config node?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![GogoVega](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/user_avatar/discourse.nodered.org/gogovega/32/71313_2.png) [@GogoVega](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/GogoVega)
#### Post date: [17 February 2025 15:15 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464/8 "2025-02-17T15:15:20Z")

</div>

Of course, config nodes like nodes can be disabled.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Colin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/user_avatar/discourse.nodered.org/colin/32/17040_2.png) [@Colin](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/Colin)
#### Post date: [17 February 2025 17:07 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464/9 "2025-02-17T17:07:59Z")

</div>

Oh yes, back at my computer I see that you can.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/uploads/nodered/original/1X/d073cd938eafa2e558d7c2cd59003b3ef4963033.png) [@system](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [18 April 2025 17:08 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/deploy-with-improperly-configured-nodes/95464/10 "2025-04-18T17:08:57Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
