# \[Flow\] Corona country comparison with Hubei (China)

**URL:** https://discourse.nodered.org/t/flow-corona-country-comparison-with-hubei-china/23237
**Category:** Share Your Projects
**Created:** [17 March 2020 17:39 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/flow-corona-country-comparison-with-hubei-china/23237 "2020-03-17T17:39:25Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 26

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![janvda](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/user_avatar/discourse.nodered.org/janvda/32/234_2.png) [@janvda](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/janvda)
#### Post date: [28 March 2020 13:01 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/flow-corona-country-comparison-with-hubei-china/23237/26 "2020-03-28T13:01:49Z")

</div>

Charts for **Belgium** with lock down date = 2020-03-12 but also including following manually added stats for today = 2020-0-28:

- new deaths = 64
- new confirmed cases = 1000 (just a rough guess - this number is not that important at this stage).

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/uploads/nodered/original/3X/a/f/afdcc284f37a69c7c0419922c8612fd756f5bc89.png)

**Observations**

1. Hubei factor is now 0.449 (1,400 deaths) while in [post 18](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/flow-corona-country-comparison-with-hubei-china/23237/18) ( 3 days ago) it was 0.324.
2. You can also see in chart `"total deaths (limited to 7 days in future)"` that Belgium is not following the Hubei chart. The number of deaths is more rapidly increasing for Belgium. We get a better fit when using 2020-03-17 (hubei factor = 0.843) or 2020-03-18 (hubei factor = 1.023) as lock down date. This is a troubling as it indicates that the measures taken by the Belgium government at 2020-03-12 don't have the same effect as the lock down measures taken by Hubei.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/flow-corona-country-comparison-with-hubei-china/23237)._
