# Node-RED Survey: Shaping the Future of Node-RED's User Experience

**URL:** <https://discourse.nodered.org/t/node-red-survey-shaping-the-future-of-node-reds-user-experience/98346>\
**Category:** News\
**Created:** [28 July 2025 10:46 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/node-red-survey-shaping-the-future-of-node-reds-user-experience/98346 "2025-07-28T10:46:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 80

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dimitrieh](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/user_avatar/discourse.nodered.org/dimitrieh/32/101708_2.png) [@dimitrieh](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/dimitrieh)\
**Post date:** [13 August 2025 07:45 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/node-red-survey-shaping-the-future-of-node-reds-user-experience/98346/80 "2025-08-13T07:45:26Z")

</div>

> [@TotallyInformation](#):
>
> In some ways, Node-RED already has too many nodes in core. This can and does limit how fast they can evolve which is not always a good things. It also makes it harder for people who aren't core devs to contribute to changes/improvements.
> 
> Thankfully, contributed nodes are first-class citizens in Node-RED so this is not an issue.

Can you elaborate on this? Curious to thoughts on this.

A lot of more recently developed applications (HA/Raycast/Figma) have moved to a place where their plugins/integrations code has been internalized/taken up into the main code base and in that way needs to pass code/security standards and are certain to have been reviewed. Harder to contribute, but also increasing quality/trust potentially? Take my thoughts here with a grain of salt, but it is a relevant topic due to the fact that with Node-RED’s custom node system it is currently hard to know which ones are good + actively maintained. Survey results point in this direction as well as an opportunity to improve upon.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/node-red-survey-shaping-the-future-of-node-reds-user-experience/98346)._
