# Rate limiter less than a second?

**URL:** <https://discourse.nodered.org/t/rate-limiter-less-than-a-second/84277>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [4 January 2024 09:27 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/rate-limiter-less-than-a-second/84277 "2024-01-04T09:27:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steve-Mcl](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/user_avatar/discourse.nodered.org/steve-mcl/32/4826_2.png) [@Steve-Mcl](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/Steve-Mcl)\
**Post date:** [8 January 2024 14:09 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/rate-limiter-less-than-a-second/84277/14 "2024-01-08T14:09:27Z")

</div>

> [@kuema](#):
>
> If you like, we can start a feature request topic and I'll write up my thoughts on that. (this evening, I have some other tasks at the moment)

there was some talk here: [Capturing errors caused inside link-call flows - #3 by gregorius](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/capturing-errors-caused-inside-link-call-flows/80010/3)

And some design proposals here: [FR: Dynamic Link node enhancement request (backlog item) · Issue #3836 · node-red/node-red · GitHub](https://github.com/node-red/node-red/issues/3836#issuecomment-1295803582) - the design stalled after failing to come to a resolution. I personally like choice (sometimes I want link call to pass msg with error, sometimes i want it to throw) but that was vetoed!

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/rate-limiter-less-than-a-second/84277)._
