# Switch node - MQTT like wildcards for switching **URL:** \ **Category:** Feature Requests\ **Created:** [27 May 2021 11:54 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/switch-node-mqtt-like-wildcards-for-switching/46337 "2021-05-27T11:54:50Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 64

**Author:** ![Steve-Mcl](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex026/user_avatar/discourse.nodered.org/steve-mcl/32/4826_2.png) [@Steve-Mcl](https://discourse.nodered.org/u/Steve-Mcl)\ **Post date:** [29 May 2021 13:21 UTC](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/switch-node-mqtt-like-wildcards-for-switching/46337/64 "2021-05-29T13:21:22Z")

> [@knolleary](#): > > Let's not make it sound like a major problem. Its not & I personally dont think that either ( dont shoot the messenger 😉 ) > [@knolleary](#): > > That doesn't justify in my mind adding them to the switch node that is used for way more than just routing mqtt messages. I understand your point but to play devils advocate (sorry) - its not really a reason not to add it either. It has a use, aligns with the whole topic concept and is additive (benefits those who would use it - others can ignore it). > [@knolleary](#): > > I'm not keen on adding such mqtt specific semantics to a non MQTT node where more generalisable solutions can be applied and a wider audience benefits Am I reading your statement correctly here if i paraphrase that as ... > **"I'm not keen on adding such mqtt specific semantics to a non MQTT node where a well defined wildcard option could be added for wider audience benefit"** ... or am i mis-reading you Nick? If I read you right then perhaps we should close this thread off here and start a new discussion on " **wildcard entry for the switch node**" in a new thread? _(please note I am personally fine with a wildcard solution instead of MQTT filter)_ --- _[View the full topic](https://discourse.nodered.org/t/switch-node-mqtt-like-wildcards-for-switching/46337)._