Is this even possible?

Can this be done, If this "widget" is ran on a web page it will return the price for WTI Crude Oil.
Is there a way for me to run this code and extract the WTI price and get it formattted as a json object?

<!-- Crude Price Script - OILCRUDEPRICE.COM -->
<div style="width:238px; border:1px solid #2D6AB4;height:auto;background-color:#FFFFFF;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;"><div style="background-color:#2D6AB4;width:100%; margin:0 auto;font-weight:bold;text-align:center; padding-top:0px;"><a href="https://www.oilcrudeprice.com/" style="font-size:20px; color:#FFFFFF;text-decoration:none;" rel="nofollow">WTI Crude Price</a></div><script src="https://www.oilcrudeprice.com/oilwidget.php?m=000000&g=FFFFFF&c=2D6AB4&i=FFFFFF&l=76A4FB&o=E6F2FA&w=240&u=wti"></script></div>
<!-- End of Crude Price Script -->

Well, my question would be:
What do you get back from this script?

Saves me loading it and running it.

You want to extract the price from https://www.oilcrudeprice.com/wti-oil-price/?

It seems like an http request node and an HTML parse node set to extract p#wtip will do it.

"77.74 US Dollar -0.13 (-0.17%)"

Could you provide me with an example of how this would look in the HTML parse node?

Thanks for the pointer, I have been able to figure out what I need and I have it working. Once again thanks for the help

If I visit the oilcrudeprice.com page today it gives me one price, and changes it after a second or two:
Untitled 3

Untitled 4

Scraping the data with the HTML parse node gives the first value $77.74. (same as it did last night)

Does this indicate that the site falsifies the initial data to discourage scraping?

In my opinion, I don't think so. This data is stock market data and depending on who they actually get their information from will depend on how often the "REAL-TIME" values are updated.

Some stock market data is not updated over the weekends while other's are.
And I'm only using this data as a "Guideline", for "Estimated Daily Production Values".

But thanks for the heads up.

jbudd, Thank you for your detailed observation. You was correct. I'm back to the drawing board.