I'd be happy with that. Though I think it should be * and ? where ? is 1 character and * is any number. I think this is the most common form of wildcards?
see Nick's original comment (post 31) about burden of choice being detrimental.
"What would Jony Ive do ?"
or just use multiple MQTT nodes - each for its relevant group of topics - ie use the wildcard in subscription as god (andysc ) intended. They can all share the same connection after all so it's no greater burden on the system.
āChoosing from larger assortments tends to increase choice difficulty and, consequently, can cause consumers to rely more on accessible justifications when making their choice,ā researchers report in their paper, published in the Journal of Consumer Research. āAs a result, we argue that choosing from a larger assortment should lead consumers to select options that are easier to justify.ā More choice leads to better choices - Futurity
I think you'll find that Nick's carefully informed but opinionated design is what has helped make Node-RED what it is over 8 years
and yes let's move it over.
PS I hope you don't think i was implying anything there - I certainly did not mean to dis anyone nor our beloved node-red (not my style). I simply hope we can all fairly agree and disagree on points of implementation now and again without offending anyone otherwise there is little point to discussion TBH.
Nah, it'll need to be something make of shiny metal and plastic if you want to get the big bucks!
Or maybe dig a tunnel under Birmingham and persuade people that driving cars through it at 30mph is a revolutionary transport method or something (more the or something since Musk seems to have already pulled that jest in Las Vegas).
I think that node-red smart glasses sound suitably futuristic I expect a small cut if you do make billions out of that suggestion of course.