Hi folks, The godfather of all Blockly nodes (alias @cymplecy ) has given his blessing to publish version 1.0.0 on NPM. So here it is finally. @knolleary : I assume you still have to add it manually to the pallette manager index? Thanks for doing that ! Thanks for all feedback and support from th…

[image] BartButenaers: who are at the moment the two most important men in my life... :sunglasses: Steady on old chap! I am British after all :blush: [image] BartButenaers: What should we do in that case, to avoid things will explode? One of two things I think, of which I prefer the 2…

[image] TotallyInformation: I doubt this is a 5-minute job and would need discussion with Nick and Dave Yes, that is why I posted this question. I have not enough knowledge to solve this at the moment [image] TotallyInformation: Don't support older versions (as Simon suggests) - actuall…

[image] BartButenaers: But you import an example flow which contains that block. Then we would run into troubles again. If I generate a 'node.error(...)' there would be no problem in this case. Good point. So you would still need to error check it, that is true.

[image] BartButenaers: Nice to hear that you are in the mood for extending the blockly node. The idea was just to add ability to use require-from-string. I want to add checkbox to allow choice what "VM" to use. In version 1.1.0 you added javascript block and we can use new function API withou…

[image] mikeS7: I want to ask about new feature: Has property in a get block is the nice feature. Could you please add default value to the get method to support javascript style such as msg.property || <value> or for a context context.get('property') || <value> Hi Mike :slight_smile: I pu…

@cymplecy Simon, it can be done such way: [image] but I've got: var1 = 'default'; var1 = (msg['payload']) || var1; 2 lines ... I want only one. OR block allows to connect only logical value or a variable at the second input

[image] mikeS7: 2 lines ... I want only one. OR block allows to connect only logical value or a variable at the second input Yes - OR in Blockly is designed to just use boolean true/falses values. Unfortunately, the basic Blockly blocks such as this cannot be altered in what types they will …

And if you had a need to use a lot of them then I'd just create a simple function to do the job [image]

Hi Mike, thanks for joining our discussion! [image] mikeS7: add ability to use require-from-string Never used that before. Do you want it to add extra libraries, without having to specify them in the settings.js file? If so, can the generated code be copied to a function node (or will the …

Node-red-contrib-blockly 1.0.0 available

Share Your Nodes

dceejay 9 September 2018 10:10 52

don't forget that that syntax doesn't always work as 0, "0", false, etc are all "falsey" in javascript, so while it's a neat shorthand in many cases... it's not 100%. I'd argue it's safer to leave out of the blocks for now.

Topic		Replies	Views
[ANNOUNCE] Visual programming a function node with Blockly - Feedback request Share Your Nodes	207	12237	6 June 2020
[ANNOUNCEMENT] node-red-contrib-blockly version 2.1.0 & 2.2.0 & 2.3.0 Share Your Nodes	19	910	30 October 2023
Node-red-contrib-blockly 1.1.0 released Share Your Nodes	4	1154	12 December 2019
[ANNOUNCE] node-red-contrib-blockly : 2.0.0 betas (currently at beta 2) Share Your Nodes	31	2003	17 August 2021
Node-red-contrib-simpletime enhancement Developing Nodes	64	2199	2 September 2020

Node-red-contrib-blockly 1.0.0 available

Related topics